Friday, October 30, 2009

Importing Puppies


During the Best Friends No More Homeless Pets Conference last week, there was some discussion about Best Friends newer promotion, Pup my Ride. This is a program where larger, more full animal shelters (generally in the South) ship some of their puppies up North where they will have more of a chance to be adopted. Some of these shelters in the South (and everywhere) are disturbingly horrific, conditions wise, and together, kill over 5 million cats and dogs every year, simply because they are overpopulated. Some shelters even still use gas chambers, as they are legal in 38 states (NOT Maine!).

Some of the Northern shelters have much calmer conditions, and are not overrun with unwanted pets. The demand for puppies and smaller dogs is much higher, and they have a much higher adoption rate. It makes sense to allocate these dogs and puppies where they will have a better chance of being adopted. So, Best Friends works to relocate these dogs in large amounts to other shelters where they will be adopted quickly.

It seems like such a win win situation. The shelter in the South makes more room for incoming dogs without having to kill off as many dogs, and the people in the Northern communities get the puppies they are longing for.

Every shelter has an adoption rate, and a euthanasia (or kill) rate. It's hard to determine what this rate is for each individual shelter, since they are not generally published by the shelter unless they are really good statistics, but it is a number that should be paid close attention to by anyone working for, or patronizing the shelter. Unfortunately, many animal shelters in the US have become "high kill" shelters where they do no more than take in an animal, wait a few days, and then kill it. While there are many many wonderful rescues which have a low kill rate, I am focusing on the ones that make up this high number of 5 million per year.

When other puppies come into a shelter, it is great for the community, as well as for the publicity. It seems like such a wonderful situation. But what if there really isn't enough room for these puppies? Is it ethical and right to kill the older, less adoptable dogs to make room for these puppies, because we know that they will be adopted quickly and make a great name for the shelter? When you think of it that way, it seems horrible and unthinkable.

But if you don't kill the older dog to make room for the younger, healthier pup, the puppy will likely be killed in his own shelter. Does that make it right to kill the older dog? Whose responsibility is it at this point to stop the killing?

I think that if you run a shelter, it is your responsibility to choose the volume of animals that you are capable of taking in. Once those animals are in your care, it is the responsibility of that shelter to ensure that they remain a no kill environment. No shelter can take in every animal. Best Friends generally has over 2,000 animals at a time, and they still have to refuse animals every day. They must rely on the other shelters and rescues of the country to do their part as well.

So if there is a shelter who can take in an amount of puppies WITHOUT sacrificing the care of their current residents, I think that this is a great networking opportunity to save thousands of lives. It is also a great example of different communities helping each other out. However, I do think that it is important to be aware of some of the practices that may be going on that you, as an adopter, constituent, or animal lover may not know.

I do encourage you to support your local no kill animal shelters, and if they are not no kill, encourage them to become a no kill shelter. Ask them how many animals they kill per year, and work with them on some ways they could reduce that number. It can be done, it has been done, and it needs to be done more often.

25 years ago, over 17 million healthy cats and dogs were being killed in American shelters every year. Since then, the number has dropped to around 5 million. That is still over 13,000 innocent cats and dogs being killed every single day. Tell me we don't have an overpopulation problem. I encourage you to always adopt, and never purchase. At this point, there is no room to be breeding and multiplying more cats and dogs. It's simple math. I also encourage you to visit your local shelters, and see what you might be able to do to help them out. Maybe you could set up a network of foster homes, that would help save animals from being killed. Maybe it is something as simple as that that would help.

I will be happy to answer any questions on this topic, or further explain anything I didn't cover in this blog.


2 comments:

  1. Hi Cassie,
    This is a great topic for a blog, since so many shelters in Maine take in transport dogs from down South. It's a wonderful thing to do IF a shelter or rescue has space available.

    I just wanted to add that the term No Kill can be a sticky one for shelters to grapple with:
    Having worked at a very low kill, open admission shelter, that placed pit bulls, seniors, ferals, and pets with medical conditions (all of which are very dfficult to place), we were often told by the public that they would not donate to us because we were not a No Kill shelter. It was very frustrating, since we worked so hard to adopt out every single safe animal!

    I hope the public knows that very few shelters get to choose how many or what kind of animals they take in every year - most are contracted by cities and town to take every animal surrendered, injured, or confiscated in their area. They generally have no control over the number of pets they take in and must make space (through adoption, foster, transport, and euthansia) for incoming animals.

    So, it's important that the public look at each shelter individually to determine if it's being run well and that the animals are well cared for during their stays...and not just support a place based on if it's a No Kill facility or not.

    And thank you for encouraging people to work with their local shelters to lower their euthanasia rates - shelters can't do it without the support of the communty! You're the best Cassie!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Jessica-
    You are correct, people should understand that the term "no-kill" generally leaves a margin for animals that must be euthanized due to illness, and shouldn't be the only determining factor when deciding whether to support a shelter. There are many other things that you need to consider in addition.
    I will stress again how important it is for people to get involved with their shelters, and learn how we can come together to increase the save rate, and produce more adoptions. What has been acceptable shelter practices for many needs to be brought to light to the public, and we need to change those numbers. Again, this does not go for all shelters, as some have fantastic practices.
    Thanks for the comment!

    ReplyDelete